And it takes one lawyer to decide those policies don’t really matter and an institution will join in on institutional harassment:

Students AND STAFF are responsible for…:

Any institution is required to hold its officer to the same level of expectation:

Language required: THIS POLICY PROTECTS A STUDENT’S RIGHT TO LEARN IN A HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINATION-FREE ENVIRONMENT. IT PROTECTS THE LEARNER’S ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THEIR FREEDOM OF INQUIRY

The unwritten assumption in all these documents is they exist to warn the student, not protect them. What is the policy involved if the institution refuses its duty of care to the most vulnerable members of their community?:

Language required; against a student OR AN INSTITUTIONAL EMPLOYEE OR THE INSTITUTION ITSELF

A student is a complainant if they complain against an employee or the institution itself — which they still have every right to do so as per the 1996 Discrimination and Harassment Policy. They also could be the subject of institutional misconduct.

Language required: ANY ACT THAT VIOLATES THEIR RIGHTS OR FREEDOMS AS A STUDENT IS ALSO MISCONDUCT.

Absolutely:

Must be nice:

Excellent:

They should be protected against this, as well. A link to the Scholarly Integrity Policy would be required:

Good:

These are all misconduct that institutional officers must agree to as well: